Get Out: White Racism or Mind Control?

“This is just another Hollywood movie designed to make black people hate white people.”

That was the first comment that I saw on Twitter about comedian Jordan Peele’s directorial debut and box office smash horror movie, Get Out. It would have been easy enough to believe it, when we consider the plethora of such movies that Tinseltown keeps turning out, usually hearkening back to the black slavery period. Sometimes you have to wonder what Hollywood would do for villains without Nazis and Southern slave masters.

The conservative National Review in its review gave a somewhat more articulate voice to these fears about the movie: “Get Out is the recrudescence of Obama-era unconsciousness. Reducing racial politics to trite horror-comedy, it’s an Obama movie for Tarantino fans.” The review is entitled “Return of the Get-Whitey Movie,” and it is written by the appropriately named, Armond White.

The liberal Hollywood-insider types did little to change this initial perception with their reviews. After an opening sentence gushing over the movie as a “satisfying thriller,” the Hollywood Reporter follows it with this: “Moreover, its timing couldn't be better, as it exploits racial fears that have become substantially more potent (not to mention more comprehensible for many white Americans) since the events of Nov. 8.”

Variety, for its part, seems to remove all doubts that Get Out is the latest example of Hollywood playing identity politics at its worst and is likely to be as big a turn-off to the group Nigel Farage calls the “decent people” as would, say, the editorial pages of The Washington Post or a Hillary Clinton political rally:

Clearly, “Get Out” will play very differently to black and white audiences — and if the film doesn’t rile a significant contingent of the latter, it simply isn’t doing its job. But there’s something telling in the underlying anxiety that Peele’s script exploits, from the opening scene (in which an uneasy black man walking alone in a predominately white suburb recalls the fate of Trayvon Martin) to the last, when the arrival of a police car suggests a near-certain turn for the worse.

What a watershed feat Peele has pulled off, delivering such a gloriously twisted thriller that simultaneously has so much to say about the state of affairs in post-Obama America. “Get Out” goes there, so to speak, and though one could argue that it crosses the line, the film’s subversive p.o.v. challenges the place of white privilege from which most pop culture is conceived. By revealing how the ruling majority gives freedoms, but they can also take them away, Peele seizes upon more than just a terrifying horror-movie premise; he exposes a reality in which African-Americans can never breathe easy.

Well, I’m white, and I must say that if Variety’s reviewer Peter Debruge, who from his photograph appears also to be white, felt himself identifying in any way with those white people, then the world of show business and its journalists must be even more messed up than I thought it was.

The villainy that I saw portrayed in an exaggerated fashion—though less exaggerated than one might suspect—is indeed with us and it is threatening to vulnerable people, but it doesn’t just threaten blacks. The oppressors in this case are also a long way from what Debruge calls a “ruling majority.” I would call them the A.C.E. crowd, the abusive criminal elite who really are in the saddle and running things. They are a small, but very powerful, ruling minority. There are more of them than we would like to think in the very top stratum of our society and the very worst thing about them is that they regard other human beings as just so many board game pieces to be used, and, if it pleases them, to be used up.

Jordan Peele is no garden-variety race merchant cut out of the Al Sharpton or Spike Lee mold. His mother is white and so is his wife. To be sure he tells Ebony magazine in this interview that the movie is all about the persecution of blacks, but he knows his audience and he wants to sell movie tickets. He also wanted to get his movie made and he wants to continue in the business. Watch him doing impressions of celebrities on the same web site and you can see his chameleon-like skills at work as he gets into character. Peele is a very clever fellow, indeed.

Mind Control

Just look at the movie with your own two eyes. The villains are quintessential limousine liberals and their victims are virtual mind-controlled zombies. On the most benign metaphorical level one could see the movie as a depiction of the so-called “liberal plantation” at work. Power hungry people among the ruling elite have found that all they need to do is to make the proper seductive cooing sounds toward various minority groups, most energetically during election years, and they know that they can count on the latter’s support. Here we have a statement from an individualist who happens to be a homosexual male expressing independence from such control, putting me in mind of the rescue of Get Out’s main character:

So please excuse me if, as a minority, I don’t want to be a political pawn that is used in aiding people that detest freedom to gain power over society. Please excuse me if, as a minority, I don’t wish to trample on the rights of others and create real resentment that could create real danger for myself as a minority.

But a viewer of the film could also take the kidnapping and mind-controlling more literally and relate it to an appalling practice engaged in in particular by rich, powerful people in various Western countries. One does not have to take everything in this Gordon Duff article last year in Veterans Today as the literal truth—much of what he alleges comes from unnamed sources—to recognize that there is a great deal of documented truth in it:

A pedophile ring, 70,000 strong, has been identified and hundreds arrested, an organization run on the internet, centered in the Free Energy Community, including websites run out of Paris, the Netherlands and Belgium.

What isn’t being told is that this same organization, also known as the Red Circle, runs through secret societies around the world:

· Bilderberg

· St. Hubertus

· Federalist Society

· Knights of Malta (Rome, not KMFAP in Budapest)

· Council on Foreign Relations

· Federal Reserve Bank

· NATO

· Royal Families of Belgium and Netherlands

· SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States)

Duff, among other things, provides an alternative explanation for the very hard to believe one we have been given for Justice Antonin Scalia’s death and briefly alludes to the subject of our next section.

The Franklin Cover-Up

What Duff is writing about has ample precedent for much of it to be readily believed. One need only do a little nosing around into something known as the Franklin cover-up. The following quote from Charles Young’s Counterpunch review of Nick Bryant’s comprehensive 2009 book, The Franklin Scandal: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse, and Betrayal, provides a good introduction to the subject:

This isn’t “conspiracy theory.” It’s one of the best investigative books I’ve ever read. If it’s true, then there are significant elements in America’s ruling class that are depraved beyond Caligula’s dreams. And I don’t see how it isn’t true. Parts of the The Franklin Scandal read like a great crime novel. Parts of it read like Nick was trying to build an impregnable legal fortress of fact to make his case stick, which can slow down the story a bit, but as the facts come together, it is staggering. (emphasis and link added)

Here it is described at Michael Rivero’s WhatReallyHappened.com: “This was the biggest pedophile scandal in the history of the U.S.A. The story received some newspaper coverage but there was a TV News Media blackout on the subject. For this reason, most Americans have never heard of it.” Especially valuable at Rivero’s site is the 56 minute video, Conspiracy of Silence, which he introduces this way:

Originally scheduled to air in May of 1994 on the Discovery Channel, "Conspiracy of Silence" was yanked at the last minute due to formidable pressure applied by top politicians. Some very powerful people did not want you to watch this documentary.

If you watch the video and then go to the Wikipedia page entitled Franklin child prostitution ring allegations what you will see is that this is a cover-up that is ongoing. Not only is Bryant’s book missing from Wikipedia’s list of references but so, too, is Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp’s The Franklin Cover-up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska. You might try to rectify the situation but I’m sure that you would have about as much success as a person putting a reference to Mike Campbell’s Amelia Earhart: The Truth at Last on Wikipedia’s Amelia Earhart page.

Another good short source of information about the Franklin Scandal is to be found at The People’s History. YouTube is also a good place to learn about the subject. You might do your own search, but I would recommend the lecture by former FBI agent Ted Gunderson. While you are at YouTube you might also search pedophilia and Hollywood together. One very informative presentation I discovered is PizzaGate Could Unravel Hollywood’s Pedophilia Ring that Elijah Wood & Corey Feldman Warned.

Now what do you think the chances are that Jordan Peele in his show business career might have encountered, or at least gotten wind of, these sorts of goings on among the people at the very upper reaches of the profession? Now ask yourself another question. How likely would it be that he could get a movie made that pointed the finger directly at these privileged, upper-crust perverted villains?

Friends of Bill and Hillary?

After I watched Get Out I promptly went to Twitter and put up the message that the movie was not really about racism but was about the sort of people that Bill and Hillary Clinton hang out with. It produced predictable responses, positive and negative, across the ideological divide.

From the previous mention of PizzaGate in the article one can easily deduce that I could be referring to people like Hillary’s campaign manager John Podesta. In light of what was revealed in the Franklin scandal, the allegations swirling around PizzaGate become much more believable. In fact, PizzaGate for Dummies should be enough to convince you that there is, indeed, some real fire behind all the PizzaGate smoke.

Even before Wikipedia released the very curious Podesta emails there was evidence of such sleazy Clinton connections. I refer in particular to Bill’s close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire who has been convicted of engaging in child sex slavery. This is from Fox News:

Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” -- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com.

Clinton’s presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double that, and trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.

Such is Epstein’s power and influence however, that his sentence amounted to little more than the proverbial slap on the wrist. It really would be hard to find a better example of the abusive criminal elite than Bill’s buddy Jeffrey. Although we do have this report on Fox News, the reporting by the major media on Epstein and his exploits has been virtually non-existent, quite reminiscent, in fact, of the dearth of coverage of the enormous Franklin scandal. Had these matters been given the news coverage that they merit, as had the allegations of the actors Elijah Wood and Corey Feldman, the news media could hardly get by with treating PizzaGate as simply too outrageous to be worthy of anyone’s consideration.

The CIA and Mind Control

In my tweet I suggested that the villains in Get Out were the kind of people that both Clintons hang out with, not just Bill. If you do a Net search of “CIA sex slaves Hillary Clinton” you come up with not just one but two women who fit the mind-controlled description who claim to have had sexual encounters with Hillary. They are Cathy O’Brien and Brice Taylor. Those two links are to first-person YouTube presentations. One can read O’Brien’s narrative of her encounter with Hillary at The Hip Hop Looking Glass and also see the presentations of other mind control victims. Taylor’s written account of sex under duress with each of the Clintons can be found at You’ve Got Questions?

Readers who might have difficulty believing that Hillary has a homosexual proclivity to be catered to by these women should read my 2007 article, “Is Hillary Clinton a Lesbian?” On Bill’s long-term ties to the CIA see the section headed, “Blumenthal and the Clintons,” in my article, “Sidney Blumenthal, Vince Foster, and the Deep State.”

CIA mind control is certainly a real phenomenon. A good primer is to be found at the Wikipedia page for Project MKUltra. Hugh Turley in “Code Name ARTICHOKE” describes one of the worst scandals associated with the project, the probable murder of their own would-be whistleblower, Frank Olson, in a short article on my web site.

An outrage on a much bigger scale is the fact that a major purpose of the mind control program was to develop assassins who could not be connected to those who programmed them and who could not remember what they had done. In an article confirming the existence of such a program published just last year, the New York Post at the same time assures us, not very convincingly to my mind, that “The program was reduced in scope in the late ’60s and stopped completely in 1973.”

Even if the newspaper is right about the operation’s termination date, Robert Kennedy convicted assassin, Sirhan Sirhan, who certainly looked and acted mind controlled, would have made the cut. But since 1973 we have also seen the same vacant look on the faces of people like Timothy McVeigh, Aurora, Colorado, movie theater shooter James Holmes, and most recently Charleston church shooter Dylann Roof.

As big a role as mind control plays in Get Out, you may scour the huge number of reviews from around the country as I have and you will hardly find the subject mentioned. Virtually everyone seems to be blinded by the race angle, as though we were expected to be nothing but a nation of Van Joneses and Jared Taylors. I imagine that Jordan Peele is not at all displeased with this simplistic take on his opus. He wouldn’t want to see his budding career in the entertainment profession go the way of Mort Sahl’s, after all.

David Martin

March 17, 2017

Home Page    Columns Column 5 Archive  Contact